Global Financial Crisis

73

By James A Watkins

PRESIDENT FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT
See all 5 photos
PRESIDENT FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT

HOME OWNERS LOAN CORPORATION

The home mortgage business was once the exclusive domain of the banking industry. As with nearly every aspect of our lives that were once private affairs between citizens in America, the government under President Franklin Roosevelt decided to get involved in 1933 as a part of FDR's New Deal.

President Franklin Roosevelt established the Home Owners Loan Corporation, one of the many of FDR's New Deal bailout programs, to buy troubled mortgages from banks. Within a few years this government program of President Franklin Roosevelt had a payroll of over $26,000,000 in 1936 dollars—$388,000,000 today.

20% of the loans FDR's New Deal issued ended up in default (with taxpayers' money) compared with the accepted standard rate of 3% in the home mortgage industry.

Within a dozen years 40% of all mortgages were guaranteed by the United States government with taxpayers' money. The foreclosures on these loans boomed by 500% during the 1950s.

PRESIDENT LYNDON JOHNSON
PRESIDENT LYNDON JOHNSON

THE GREAT SOCIETY

In the 1960s, The Great Society of President Lyndon Johnson included laws to grant poor people home loans guaranteed by the government—meaning the taxpayers.

One out of five of these loans in some major cities under the Great Society of President Lyndon Johnson went to welfare mothers.

The losses to the taxpayers of this policy of the Great Society was $1,400,000,000 in 1971 dollars as they were foreclosed at an astonishing rate of 1100% higher than ever before.

PRESIDENT CARTER
PRESIDENT CARTER

FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC

President Carter signed into law the Community Reinvestment Act in 1977. The Community Reinvestment Act of President Carter was designed to force banks to issue home mortgages in poor, primarily black neighborhoods. The loans were guaranteed by the government—meaning the taxpayers—through Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. When loans given to people who were not creditworthy were not paid back Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae would cover them with funds confiscated from taxpayers.

In the late 1980s ACORN exerted pressure that resulted in the government passing a law that guaranteed 30% of all Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans would go to low-income people backed by money confiscated from taxpayers.

PRESIDENT CLINTON
PRESIDENT CLINTON

PRESIDENT CLINTON

Under President Clinton, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were forced to approve loans, with taxpayers' money, to people with lousy credit; who had no money down; with monthly payments up to 50% of their income—even if their only income was welfare paid to them from the earnings of working taxpayers.

Pressured by President Clinton, in 1994 regular banks soon followed these same pitiful guidelines with Countrywide Financial leading the way. Any bank that did not sign up was designated "racist" and we all know any corporation will do anything not to be branded with that pejorative moniker.

Banks were told by the Federal Reserve that they must take into account the economic culture and extenuating circumstances of poor and/or black people and disregard bad credit. Soon the Congressional Hispanic Caucus jumped on the band wagon demanding Latinos be included in these insane mortgage loan policies even if they were new immigrants or even illegal immigrants. And so they were.

Small banks, very nervous about these mortgages that did not meet sound criteria, sold them to big banks who sold them to Wall Street and other investors around the world with the express condition that they were guaranteed by United States taxpayers' money—earned by working or producing something toward the Commonweal. Meanwhile, from the 1930s until the current decade all of these new unqualified buyers caused an explosion in real estate prices—demand outstripped supply with resultant rising prices—causing virtually all real estate in America to be vastly overvalued.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA

THE RECESSION & GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS

When the recession hit, as it always does eventually, it was caused largely because many of these same people in control of our government during the last thirty years had shut down nuclear power plant building, drilling for oil, mining for coal, and building refineries, which made America dependent on foreign oil for energy. Millions of people were unable to pay their mortgages. Small banks couldn't pay big banks; big banks couldn't pay investors—who by now included everybody with a 401K—and the global financial crisis ensued.

There is a common thread throughout this whole sordid story leading to the recession and the global financial crisis. All of the people involved were Liberal Democrats.

So how do ignorant American voters respond to the recession and global financial crisis? They buy into propaganda that it is the fault of President Bush and give these same Liberal Democrats complete power over our lives after the 2008 elections. I have a good friend who is a banker with Bank of America. I asked him a few days ago, "What exactly is the Obama plan for this crisis?" He said, "We are going to bail out the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac borrowers." The same mistake favoring minorities who don't pay their bills that led to this crisis in the first place. That is when I decided to write this article.

Comments

Vladimir Uhri profile image

Vladimir Uhri Level 5 Commenter 3 years ago

Very good eyes opening informarion. We appreciate it.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 3 years ago

Vladimir— Thank you! I knew this would be controversial but I spent a lot of time researching and I hope my article is bullet proof. As Al Gore says, the Truth can be inconvenient. A appreciate you for reading and commenting.

Nemingha profile image

Nemingha 3 years ago

Read your article with interest but I'm not American so I don't think I should comment on your country's Administration. However, the affects of the current situation have been felt worldwide, and there are some lessons we should all learn from this. The most important, I think, is that to some degree we all try to live way beyond our means and it needs to stop. Excellently written as usual.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 3 years ago

Nemingha— Thank you for reading and commenting.

I have learned a huge lesson from this. My business of nine years, that employed 140 people at one time, failed a few months ago.

So, I have been investigating how this happened. I keep hearing Bush Bush Bush! If that were true it would be allright with me—my name isn't Bush. So I thought, "What did Bush do to cause this financial crisis?" I have plenty of time on my hands so I have been studying it and I gotta say, I wish the government would stay out of private business. But instead, they may take over the banking and manufacturing sectors.

Larry Lathrop profile image

Larry Lathrop 3 years ago

Excellent history lesson pics add extra punch. As usual a crisis really doesn't happen over night but is a long train of abuse and neglect. Most of our modern travail can be traced back to the dawn of the 20th century with Wilson and especially Roosevelt. The Dems are notorious but like you I don't have much use for the Republicans either. Wallace was correct with the dime analogy. Attaching a video that is appropriate for this Hub you may have seen it. Keep up the good work and Keep the Faith.

http://tinyurl.com/dl4u2w

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 3 years ago

Larry— I appreciate your encouragement.  That is a great video.  I hope everyone who reads this post will also watch it. 

Wallace as in George?  Not a dime's difference? 

Thanks for making your valuable addition to the story.

eovery profile image

eovery 3 years ago

Thanks for doing the research on this. I knew about Clintons involvement, but the other, I did not.

One big problem I have with this is Clinton, Johnson and possibly Kennedy, I think had a Republican controlled congress. How did they let this happen and pass the bills through congress. I guess they are getting as bad as the Democrats on this. This is what is is really pissing me off. Our so called Republicans who are supposed to be against this crap is allowing it to happen.

Keep on Hubbing!

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 3 years ago

eovery— You are welcome! Thank you commenting. The Republicans have abandoned their Conservative principles and been weak-kneed when faced with charges of racism by activist groups. Nice to hear from you.

eovery profile image

eovery 3 years ago

Here's a good video explaining more in depth of what happened.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICSRvTihjKw&fea

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 3 years ago

eovery— That was a great video. Thanks for sharing. I had not seen that. Mr. Smith goes to Washington?

Geoff Parnell 3 years ago

James, the most frustrating thing about these undeniable facts is the fact that the American people can not see past the Hate Bush campaign started by the damn liberals as they had no other platform to base their program on. The American people did not vote for Obama,a vitual unknown, they voted against Bush based on the hate propaganda and lies put forward by these liberals. The very people the American voting public have put in charge of the fixing of the financial crisis are the ones that caused it!!!! they need to fix the CAUSE not the complaint.

May God have mercy on us because it can only get worse with the current people at the "helm"

The economy is controlled by the consumer, enable the consumer and the rest will take care of itself!!!.And keep liberal medling out of the mess they created.

Regards

Geoff

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 3 years ago

Geoff— Thank you for reading and expressing your acute understanding of our situation. I cannot deny the accuracy of everything you said.

BrianS profile image

BrianS 3 years ago

It seems completely ridiculous to me that money is lent to people that have no possible hope and very often, I suspect, no intention of paying it back. This as you have stated leaves the tax payer with the burden of picking up the bill to prevent meltdown in the financial sector.

So what is the proposed answer, generate more money, put it in the system and buy your way out of trouble. All I can say is, if that is going to stand even the slightest chance of working, then the banks cannot continue along their previously chosen path of just lending to anyone, there has to be proper and measured assessment of who can receive loans dependent on their ability to ultimately repay what they borrow.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 3 years ago

Brian S— I agree with every word you said. Things changed a lot, also, went the big banks went public. There was a time when the owners of a bank actually worked there and had, of course, a huge stake in outcomes. When the banks went public, what's the best way to please the stockholders (temporarily) and grab huge bonuses? Creative bookkeeping! After all, it's not your money.

Thank you for reading and your insightful commentary.

ethel smith profile image

ethel smith Level 3 Commenter 2 years ago

British and we have far too many administration and banking problems to comment but your hub was a good read.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 2 years ago

ethel smith— Thank you for reading and leaving your comment. Nice to meet you.

Virgil Hill profile image

Virgil Hill 2 years ago

Yeah - no one can ague that the mortgage crisis did not change the world. It remains to be seen how it will all turn out. I am not hopeful.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 2 years ago

Virgil Hill— We must hope for the best. I appreciate you for reading my article and leaving your comments. Thanks!

Kebennett1 profile image

Kebennett1 Level 4 Commenter 2 years ago

I have lived in the same Double Wide Mobile home on the same piece of property for 20 years! My husband and I never bought outside of our ability to pay--never will! We make a decent living around $70,000 a year. Our property is paid off and we just bought a new vehicle! I can't believe how much people are paying for their mortgages, it is outrageous! We always have wondered how people have done it! No wonder there are so many foreclosures! If you can't afford it--Don't buy it! Thank you for the eye opening information. Keep it up!

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 2 years ago

kebennett1— You are fortunate to have been wise in your financial decisions. Even squirrels know to save up acorns for winter. I wish I had been as smart as a squirrel. Congratulations on a paid off home. THAT is the American Dream! I appreciate your incisive commentary. And thank you so much for your readership, too. It means a lot to me.

Allan McGregor profile image

Allan McGregor Level 2 Commenter 23 months ago

Excellent article, James.

And considering that it was written over a year ago, it should be astonishing that nothing has changed. But it hasn't. The only thing is that you focus blame on the Democrat 'useful idoiots' and virtually none on the big bankers who duped them. Because while the small man has been right royaly ripped off by both governments and banks, those at the top of the tree have insulated themselves by ring-fencing their feather-nested accounts well away from the fire.

Anyone who has studied the history of financial 'Bubbles' over the centuries - from the famous 17th Century Dutch tulip bulb fiasco and the English South Sea Bubble of the 18th, to today's bust Property Boom could recognise and predict the current collapse. I certainly did. But who wanted to listen to 'fools' and 'Jeremiahs' like me when the good times were a-rollin'?

As you rightly identify, this was caused by pumping more and more money into a volatile fiscal sieve, causing rampant house price inflation.

The fact is, a £1500 house in 1954 would still cost £1500 today if not for inflation. (Less even, if wear and tear is taken into account.) What puts any prices up is always the same - 'supply and demand', but by insidiously teasing out the rope to make unaffordable mortgages 'affordable' demand was increased from among those who now imagined they could afford what they actually couldn't.

But once a rubber band has been stretched as far as it can go, it either stops stretching, retracts, or simply snaps. And our Western economies have snapped causing the sudden release of the lethal tension of unsupportably high property prices generated by inflationary lending policies.

Sadly, misguided and shortsighted politicians thought it a good thing that the £1500 house of 1954 had become the £200,000 house of 2007, while failing to recognise that much of the apparent economic 'growth' in the interim had in fact been driven by the inflation generated on the back of the property boom.

The clarion cry of so many today is 'Where did all the money go?' The painful truth is it was never there in the first place. Rather millions of dupes learned to lived high on the hog on phantom finances.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Hub Author 23 months ago

Allan McGregor— Thank you, kind sir. Yes, I agree that many nests have been feathered during this long process. And surely, bubbles come and go. I am afraid I fell susceptible to this one myself. I knew better. I didn't listen to my innver voice.

It was never there in the first place. Yes, indeed, my friend. It never was.

Thank you for visiting me and leaving your always excellent comments.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working